08:16:37 From ivar Martin : Presumably the simulations in Josephson effect assume that phase is fully ordered. How does KT physics (fluctuations) affect the analysis? 08:28:16 From uri zondiner to All panelists : 0.5T in what direction? 08:28:41 From uri zondiner to All panelists : Sorry perpendicular 08:29:17 From Oskar Vafek to All panelists : Is the low T activated transport at H=0 in the CI also anisotropic? 08:36:48 From ivar Martin : im here 08:37:10 From ivar Martin : nvm 08:38:10 From Eun-Ah Kim - Coordinator to ivar Martin, All Panelists : please raise your blue hand ivar 08:38:54 From Cory Dean - Coordinator to All panelists : sorry eun-ah you want next question? 08:40:31 From ivar Martin : same q as Eun-Ah about CDW vs nematic 08:48:32 From Andrey Chubukov - Coordinator to All panelists : Cory, can I ask 09:09:23 From Arup Paul to All panelists : in the patch model what would be the effect of interlayer electric field and magnetic field on the coupling between the patches 09:13:12 From Eun-Ah Kim - Coordinator to All panelists : I would think the vH mechanism of nematic would align the pneumaticity direction to the lattice direction? 09:19:45 From Louk Rademaker to All panelists : I can’t talk, but can you ask a question for me? She mentioned interaction-induced topological phases. Is that similar to the idea from Das et al (Bernevig-Efetov) about a spontaneous “Haldane mass gap”? 09:20:37 From Louk Rademaker to All panelists : (sorry, I meant Bernevig-Yazdani, this paper arXiv:2007.03810) 09:27:27 From Louk Rademaker to All panelists : if you want I can try to talk about it? 09:27:52 From Cory Dean - Coordinator to Louk Rademaker, All Panelists : you have “permission” to talk if you want to resopnd 09:30:19 From Dmitry Chichinadze to All panelists : Interaction model is special. These nonlocal terms come from the fragile topologiy, as shown by Kang&Vafek 09:30:27 From Dmitry Chichinadze to All panelists : *was shown 09:38:05 From Cenke Xu to All panelists : I have a very basic question that I hope you can help me understand: if VH singulariy plays a very important role in Moire, then it seems a bit surprising to me that so many universal features were observed in different Moire systems, since the location of the VH singularity, despite some degree of symmetry protection, would highly depend on the detailed band structure. 09:41:44 From Laura Classen to All panelists : I would see this the other way around. Van Hove physics provides a way for unification. The important ingredients are the presence of Van Hove points and the symmetries of the interactions. Although details, which order wins then depends on microscopic models. But there is the universal aspect from the Van Hove points, which leads to very similar ordering candidates as we have shown for 6 and 12 patch models for the same microscopic Hamiltonian. 09:42:57 From Laura Classen to All panelists : Oh thanks 09:42:59 From Laura Classen to All panelists : I’ll resend 09:43:09 From Laura Classen to All panelists : I would see this the other way around. Van Hove physics provides a way for unification. The important ingredients are the presence of Van Hove points and the symmetries of the interactions. Although details, which order wins then depends on microscopic models. But there is the universal aspect from the Van Hove points, which leads to very similar ordering candidates as we have shown for 6 and 12 patch models for the same microscopic Hamiltonian. 09:43:26 From Laura Classen to All panelists : Sorry. This didn’t work 09:43:34 From Laura Classen : I would see this the other way around. Van Hove physics provides a way for unification. The important ingredients are the presence of Van Hove points and the symmetries of the interactions. Although details, which order wins then depends on microscopic models. But there is the universal aspect from the Van Hove points, which leads to very similar ordering candidates as we have shown for 6 and 12 patch models for the same microscopic Hamiltonian. 09:45:58 From ivar Martin : to Ashvin: 1. how heavy would those double bi-skyrmions, and at what T would they condense? 2. What are the observable consequences, to distinguish from more standard (e.g. phonon) pairing? 09:46:10 From Laura Classen : My previous message was in response to the question if it is surprising that so many universal features were observed in different Moire systems if VH singularities plays a very important role in Moire 09:53:38 From Chunli Huang to All panelists : to ashwin: What determines the phase of the skyrmion-antiskyrmion bound state wavefunction? Why should all pairs condense with with the same phase? 09:58:38 From Inti Sodeman to All panelists : Hi All. I need to leave in a few moments. Might try to join later on. Thanks so much again for inviting me! 09:59:04 From Jia Li to All panelists : yup 10:19:39 From Richa Mitra to All panelists : To Jia Li: Hi !! My question is: Since the interlayer separation in very small which is 3nm, the two layers are in strong correlation regime. In that case interlayer coulomb interaction becomes relavant. So how much the coulomb drag effect is relavant? if yes, did you separate that effect? 10:20:40 From Andrey Chubukov - Coordinator to Richa Mitra, All Panelists : I can read your question, or you can raise your hand. What you prefer? 10:22:27 From Richa Mitra to All panelists : you can read my question. My network seems poor. Sorry for that. 10:27:51 From Cenke Xu to All panelists : Thanks! Laura 10:29:22 From Andrey Chubukov - Coordinator to Cenke Xu, All Panelists : Cenke, did you you raise your hand? 10:29:55 From Cenke Xu to All panelists : o, actually no, I did not 10:36:34 From Richa Mitra to All panelists : Thanks prof. chubukov for asking the question and thanks prof. Li for replying. 10:39:44 From Andrey Chubukov - Coordinator to Richa Mitra, All Panelists : You are welcome 10:44:39 From Eun-Ah Kim - Coordinator to Jane Park, All Panelists : @Jane Park: can you lower the zoom hand? 10:46:31 From Jane Park to All panelists : I did lower 10:46:40 From Jane Park to All panelists : Is it still raising..? 10:46:48 From Cory Dean - Coordinator to All panelists : I lowered it now 10:46:51 From Eun-Ah Kim - Coordinator to Jane Park, All Panelists : Nope. It’s good now. 10:51:18 From Nilotpal Chakraborty to All panelists : Question to Leo: Does the fact that changing Coulomb screening has no effect on the slope of the linear in T graph say anything about the strange metal vs electron-phonon contribution to linear in T debate? 11:04:18 From Cory Dean - Coordinator to All panelists : what role is spin-orbit playing here? i.e. do these states exist at these angles in absence of the TMD layer 11:05:37 From Cory Dean - Coordinator to All panelists : ah, question retracted! 11:17:36 From Andrea Young - Coordinator to All panelists : @Andrey I have a question for stevan 11:32:02 From Herb Fertig to All panelists : Thank you everyone. 11:32:09 From Andreas Bill to All panelists : Thank you! 11:32:21 From bhupesh bishnoi : bye 11:32:24 From bhupesh bishnoi : thnaks